Forensic Metadata Analysis in Detecting Digital Image Manipulation

Authors

  • Mario Anugraha UNIKA DARMA CENDIKA
  • Ryan Putranda Kristianto
  • Andre Hartanto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61179/infact.v9i02.754

Keywords:

Digital image forensics, Metadata, Digital Photo

Abstract

The development of the digital era has brought significant changes to various aspects of life, including the field of photography. Digital photos offer both advantages and disadvantages, one of which is the ease with which they can be modified using image editing software. This makes it increasingly difficult to distinguish between original and manipulated images. Edited photos can spread widely through social media, causing public concern and doubts about the authenticity of information. Individuals often manipulate images for personal gain or interests. The easy access to image editing software further facilitates this manipulation process. In the field of research, digital image forensics has emerged as a scientific method to verify the authenticity of images through accountable evidence. This study aims to detect forgery in digital photos using that approach. The method employed in this research is metadata analysis with the assistance of an offline tool called JPEGsnoop and online tool Forensically Beta. The results show differences in metadata between the original and manipulated images, indicating that modifications have been made to the image.

References

M. M. Fajar, A. Johari, and H. Atmami, “Analisis Visual Fotografi Pre-Wedding Konsep Street Fotografi Karya Naturallica Photo,” J. Desain, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 207, 2021, doi: 10.30998/jd.v8i3.8579.

M. Ali Diko Putra, A. Wirawan Muhammad, B. Parga Zen, R. Yunita Kisworini, and T. Rohayati, “Analisis Forensik Pada Instagram dan Tik Tok Dalam Mendapatkan Bukti Digital Dengan Menggunakan Metode NIST 800-86,” J. Sist. Inf. Galuh, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2024, doi: 10.25157/jsig.v2i1.3695.

K. Khairunnisak, H. Ashari, and A. P. Kuncoro, “Analisis Forensik Untuk Mendeteksi Keaslian Citra Digital Menggunakan Metode Nist,” J. Resist. (Rekayasa Sist. Komputer), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 72–81, 2020, doi: 10.31598/jurnalresistor.v3i2.634.

R. A. Ramadhan, Abdul Kudus Zaini, and Jerika Mardafora, “Pelatihan Investigasi Digital Forensik,” J. Pengabdi. Masy. dan Penerapan Ilmu Pengetah., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.25299/jpmpip.2022.11003.

M. Fransiskus and N. P, “Analisis Digital Forensik Metadata pada Rekayasa Digital Image sebagai barang bukti Digital,” J. Sains Dan Komput., vol. 8, no. 01, pp. 1–5, 2024, doi: 10.61179/jurnalinfact.v8i01.439.

I. Riadi, Nasirudin, and Sunardi, “Analisis Forensik Smartphone Android Menggunakan Metode NIST dan Tool MOBILedit Forensic Express,” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/informatika89

I. Wahyudi, A. Muntasa, M. Yusuf, and A. Hamzah, “Mengungkap Dan Menguji Keaslian Bukti Digital Pada Kejahatan Cybercrime Dengan Metode Digital Forensic Research Workshop,” J. Apl. Teknol. Inf. dan Manaj., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–127, 2021, doi: 10.31102/jatim.v2i2.1068.

K. Eka Purnama, C. Rozikin, and A. Ali Ridha, “Analisis Forensic Citra Digital Menggunakan Teknik Error Level Analysis Dan Metadata Berdasarkan Metode Nist,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1100–1107, 2023, doi: 10.36040/jati.v7i2.6660.

D. Mualfah and R. A. Ramadhan, “Analisis Digital Forensik Rekaman Kamera CCTV Menggunakan Metode NIST (National Institute of Standards Technology),” IT J. Res. Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2020, doi: 10.25299/itjrd.2021.vol5(2).5731.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

[1]
Mario Anugraha, Ryan Putranda Kristianto, and Andre Hartanto, “Forensic Metadata Analysis in Detecting Digital Image Manipulation”, IIJC, vol. 9, no. 02, pp. 56–61, Aug. 2025.